Case Analysis Prompts

Based on these facts [facts], analyze the strength of a [claim type] claim. Identify the elements we can prove, elements that may be contested, and potential defenses the opposing party might raise.

Analyze the liability exposure in this matter. Consider: (1) theories of liability, (2) strength of evidence for each element, (3) potential defenses and their likelihood of success, (4) comparative/contributory negligence issues, and (5) overall probability of liability finding.

Analyze the potential damages in this case. Include: (1) compensatory damages (economic and non-economic), (2) potential for punitive damages, (3) statutory damages if applicable, (4) mitigation issues, (5) valuation challenges, and (6) likely range of recovery.

Given our position on [issue], what are the strongest counterarguments the opposing party might make? How should we preemptively address these in our brief?

Based on these facts and legal theories [details], help develop a compelling case theme. The theme should: (1) be simple and memorable, (2) resonate with jurors/the court, (3) organize our key facts, and (4) distinguish us from the opponent's likely narrative.

Analyze the settlement value of this case. Consider: (1) likely verdict range, (2) probability of prevailing, (3) litigation costs to trial, (4) time value, (5) non-monetary factors, and (6) the opponent's likely settlement perspective.

Create a witness preparation outline for [witness]. Include: (1) key points to emphasize, (2) likely cross-examination topics, (3) difficult questions and suggested responses, (4) documents to review, and (5) demeanor guidance.

Develop a cross-examination strategy for [witness]. Based on their expected testimony [summary], identify: (1) points to concede, (2) areas to attack credibility, (3) prior inconsistent statements, (4) documents to use, and (5) the key admissions we need.

Create an outline for an opening statement in [case type]. Structure it to: (1) introduce the case theme, (2) tell our client's story, (3) preview key evidence, (4) address weaknesses proactively, and (5) set up our closing argument.

Review this evidence [description] and assess whether it is sufficient to survive summary judgment on [claim]. Identify: (1) what elements are supported, (2) gaps in the evidence, (3) admissibility issues, and (4) what additional evidence would strengthen the case.

Create a chronological timeline from these documents and facts. For each entry, note: (1) date, (2) event/document, (3) key parties involved, (4) significance to our case, and (5) what it proves or disproves.

Compare [witness's] deposition testimony with [other evidence/testimony]. Identify all inconsistencies, explain their significance, and suggest how to use them at trial for impeachment.